Sarah Palin is Just Plain Stupid

Political No Comments »

Jack Cafferty held no punches when he criticized Sarah Palin’s pathetic excuse for an “answer” to Katie Couric’s question on use of monies in the current bailout attempt.  Wolf Blitzer tries to play it nice, but Jack will have none of it.

If that wasn’t bad enough, CNN later shows the Saturday Night Live parody of the interview, where Tina Fey doesn’t even change the wording to garner humorous effect!

McCain has shot himself in the leg choosing this nitwit as a his running mate.

PETArds Scream for Human Ice Cream

Asides, Odd Bits No Comments »

Just when you thought that the morons at PETA couldn’t get any more stupid than they already were, they prove that their idiocy knows absolutely no bounds.

PETA’s Executive Vice President, Tracy Reiman, wrote a letter to Ben & Jerry’s, urging them to switch from cow to human milk in the production of their ice cream.  Read the story here.

Well Tracy, I urge you to put your teats where your mouth is!  That’s right, I want you to be the first to volunteer for the milking machines at Ben & Jerry’s.  It’s one thing to talk the talk - I want to see you walk the walk - or perhaps in this case milk the cow.

After all, how can you expect others to follow your foolishness, er…advice, if you’re not leading the way?

Once more, this really has nothing to do with animal abuse or animal rights and everything to do with the mistaken idea that humans should all be strict Vegans - ignoring all of the evolutionary traits which prove us to be omnivores.

Makes me want to go out for a big steak dinner…

All Things Foul and Ugly

Personal No Comments »

A dear friend of mine is going through some dark times at work and home these days, which has him questioning a lot of the reasoning of how things are done by his colleagues and even family. We’ve talked on the phone about his thoughts and misgivings, but his first text message to my cell phone in this conversation, got me thinking the hardest.

“It just finally sank in that you and I take for granted or as rote, what others consider forbidden, evil or sick…”

At first glance one might take this statement the wrong way, but the meaning was clear to me. He was talking about the thin veneer of “normalcy” that people in our society like to present, sticking their heads in the proverbial sand when something rears its ugly head to prove their little preconceptions of reality to be false. He was referring to the bulk of humanity in the “first world” which staggers around in their special, imaginary “harm free zones”, pretending that somehow, someway, they are immune to injury or ill - as if some guardian angel is watching over them.

Neither my friend or I suffer from this kind of delusion. Cynical as it might be, we take for granted that there are people out there who have no kind feelings toward us or our loved ones. People who at a moment’s notice, would actively cause harm - with even a sense of glee. We know they’re all around us, hiding behind that veneer, trying their best to fit in, until they can’t stand against their impulses anymore and they strike out at someone.

We also know that nature throws things at us which are dangerous and upsetting - that we can’t possibly control. Animals who decide to know what we taste like, lightning that happens to follow the charge potential to where you’re sitting, storm winds which happen to rip the roof off the house; all striking with complete dispassion.

When these things happen to those who hide behind that veneer of normalcy, the reaction is typically out of control shock and hurt surprise. When these things happen to my friend or I, the response has always been a subdued acceptance and analysis of what steps need to be taken to correct or deal with the situation - and a rapid enactment of that decision follows. The process of thought is as cold and emotionless as that of a computer, but has the advantage of remaining clear and concise.

My thoughts turned to ask why this was? How was it we had developed this sense of acceptance that many others seem incapable of facing? Was it that we had suffered too many tragedies that cynicism set in? Or was it just part of our wiring?

Frankly, I can’t remember living behind the veneer of normalcy since I was very young. I don’t recall any tragedies happening to push my mind toward cynical acceptance of the world’s horrors. I had a good childhood. No, the attitude set in the more I read history. The patterns became apparent and constant tales of woe showed nature for its unpredictability and man for his constant expression of what can only be called, evil.

Let’s face it, for all the advances mankind achieved in the twentieth century, it was also our most violent and vicious period. The tens of millions of our own kind that we killed through war and genocide are almost too staggering a number to imagine. The weapons we’ve developed to kill each other in greater numbers are almost too efficient to believe. The more I read and the more I understood what we had done through two world wars and beyond, all painted a picture I couldn’t ignore. Mankind is less noble than he would like to believe. In fact, true nobility is few and far between. I know I can’t claim it, though I have tried to be so.

The twentieth century is why I have a hard time believing we will make it as a species past the twenty first. As we dabble with genetic engineering, nano-technology and new energies - we will turn them to ill. It’s pretty much inevitable. We’ve showed none of the needed maturity to handle our technology over the last century, so we will show the same deficiencies with the new technologies we’re now pushing.

In my own mind, it is a simple acceptance of our nature. We are apes bound by selfish instincts and jealousy, not social evolved enough to handle our inventions. Worse, the ugliest of human personalities, who crave power over others, not just their property - are drawn to the rolls of our “leaders” in society, where they scheme and play with human lives, as if playing with toy soldiers.

Many are going to read such and recoil, unable to understand how anyone could function on a day to day basis with this cold attitude about mankind. Yet, I can’t understand how anyone looking at the evidence could come to a different conclusion.

I will admit that it breeds a sense of futility. It becomes hard to motivate yourself for the common good, when you know that the impact will be fleeting at best. It’s difficult to bring yourself to contribute, when you’re pretty much convinced that it will do nothing in the larger picture.

Instead, I find myself concentrating on the care of myself and loved ones. I can do good for them which will last. I can make a difference in their lives, even if it is small in the grand scheme of things. I can do this without hurting anyone else in the process, which allows me to at least try to reach some level of nobility.

For when the world around you is filled with hatred and prejudice, you can either give in and follow suit, or hold yourself to a higher standard. Though I cannot change the world, I can change myself - and in the process bring good to at least a few around me.

Political Quandry - 2008

Asides, Political No Comments »

Time is getting short on the election. With one and a half months left to try to determine if a single candidate in the mess we call the political system of America is worth their weight in horse manure, the stories just keep getting more depressing.

First and foremost, Ron Paul is out of the picture. In most states, you can’t simply put him down as a write-in candidate, either. Requirements vary from state to state, but many require that the candidates themselves file appropriate paperwork with the state in question. This does not lead to a candidate showing on the ballot, either. You’re still a write-in.

Bob Barr is the official Libertarian candidate this year and frankly I don’t know what to think of his liberty “born again” status. Barr was never a devoted fan of liberty in his years - he even voted for the Patriot Act, though now states;

“I voted for the Patriot Act– but I certainly would not do it again. It was probably the worst vote I cast in Congress. At the time we had obtained assurances from the administration that they would limit the applicability of the Patriot Act provisions. They promised that they would engage in appropriate and full reporting and disclosure to the Congress, and we were able to secure sunset clauses for a number of provisions.

But it became clear very quickly that the administration did not intend to limit the use of the Patriot Act. So one of my primary activities over the last five years since leaving Congress has been trying to undo the damage wrought by the Patriot Act and preventing further abuses.”

I don’t know whether to believe him or not, but perhaps it is best that I give him the benefit of the doubt for having changed. After all, in spite of his inability to even stand in Ron Paul’s shadow, he is at least talking the talk these days about shrinking the government and returning to the Constitution. That’s far better than what I’m hearing from the others - insecurities over whether his words will match his actions aside.

I could never vote Democratic, due to the anti-Constitution stance the party has maintained for decades. I don’t need a mother, thank you…and I don’t care to put Obama in that role. Besides, I’m quite sick of his call for “change”, when all it means is to impose a different pile of manure than what the Bush administration has layered on us. Whether the fecal flow comes from a donkey rather than an elephant is inconsequential - we’re still covered in shit.

John McCain - what can you say? Technologically inept, a poster boy for “more of the same” when it comes to the Bush war on everyone and everything “not American” - there’s nothing appealing about this guy. As for his running mate, Sarah Palin - well, that’s where I’m truly frightened. Her bronze age beliefs in the Biblical “end times” being at hand, as well as her dispensation viewpoint being so utterly against my universally libertarian nature, added to her lack of any background in foreign policy - leads to a model of interaction with the world, that would make Bush’s fiasco’s appear to be a model of foreign policy sanity. Anyone willing to sacrifice America for Israel should be immediately disqualified - and her religious beliefs would call for just that. That and since I view religious devotion as delusional thinking at best, insanity at worst, her faith alone rules her out.

Looks like it will have to be Bob Barr for me this year. I wish I could say that I was enthused with this choice, but he is quietly talking for the points I believe in. I hate to think that I’m picking the lesser evil, but if that is the case, at least I’m picking an evil which is actually calling for protection of individual liberty, while the others scream for more control.

Blissful Ignorance

Asides, Motorcycles, Religion No Comments »

I’ve come to the conclusion that following the Mormon faith makes you into an idiot, even if you didn’t start out that way.

Case in point, the drivers in the state of Utah. This morning, while motorcycling to work, I once again nearly died due to the amazing ignorance of the typical Utah driver. I call them Utards, for short. It started off typically enough, with two cars on the south bound two lanes of a divided highway, driving side by side. Neither would speed up or slow down. They were a moving wall. Eventually the one to the left decided that he wanted to merge to the right and signaled (a rarity) but when he tried to speed up to make some space, the car on the right sped up as well, to keep in parallel with the other.

This stalemate lasted for about twenty or thirty seconds, until the driver wanting to merge finally decided that he needed to speed up more than he had been and finally got ahead and merged to the right, in front of his previous dancing partner. They remained in this position for several seconds, with no sign of change, so since we were still about ten miles per hour under the limit and the car which had been on my left had fallen well behind, I decided to change left and pass them.

About the time I was half way past the rear car, with a conveniently placed metal guard to my left, he decides to merge into me without signaling his intention, or obviously checking his blind spot. He didn’t even check his mirror, to be honest. I clamped down hot on the brakes and for once managed to hit the horn at the same time (often I don’t have time to do this.) He suddenly spots me, over-compensates and nearly goes off the other side of the road into the ditch.

With my heart in my throat, I make my way past both of these dimwits and take a left turn off onto a freeway entrance ramp. This ramp leads up to it’s own lane on the freeway, which ends after about a quarter mile - to allow for smooth merging during rush hour. As I’m approaching the last eighth of a mile of this lane, moving faster than the freeway traffic to my left, another moron decides to merge to the right - right into me. No checking of the blind spot. No checking of his mirrors. He just cheerfully starts to merge into me, as I’m moving past. A quick downshift and twist of the throttle and I’m barely out of harms way again, with the driver merging in behind me, suddenly braking hard as he spots me.

First off, why the hell was he merging into a lane that was going to end in less than an eighth of a mile? There was clear visibility on a straight, flat shot of road - with at least one sign indicating that the lane was going to end. Secondly, why would either of these idiots merge without even the slightest check of clearance? Thirdly, why do they react with absolute shock that a vehicle is suddenly in the position they never checked? It’s like the time I was rear ended in my truck and the driver of the car behind me claimed to the police officer that I was in his “blind spot”.

From conversations I’ve had with various Mormons in the state of Utah, I’ve come to understand that they are completely, utterly ignorant of anything outside of their religious teachings. A great example was a conversation with a supposedly “open minded” Mormon, who’s first question asked of me was “what religion I was”, as if everyone needs a religion to exist. When I told him that I was atheist, he clearly couldn’t understand the concept that I don’t worship anything and when I stated that I saw at least some reasonable ideas in Buddhist concepts, his reply was, “So you worship Buddha, then?” Silly me, here I assumed even Buddhists don’t worship Buddha. Buddhists don’t worship anything. Never would I have guessed that finding reasonableness in some religious tenant is a declaration of worship of the religion’s namesake.

It wasn’t until I had a conversation with another Mormon acquaintance that I found the answer to the driving dangers and other stances of ignorance in Utah. He is a lapsed Mormon, much to the ire of his family, and he plainly stated that most in the church have a deeply entrenched belief that God is protecting them from all harm. They believe that a mystical, magical figure is guiding their hand in every action and keeping them safe - no matter what.

So, there you have it. They merge without even looking in their mirrors, they turn and change lanes without signaling, they make U-turns through red lights at intersections, they check their makeup in the mirror while rolling backwards down a mountainside - because they believe that God is guiding them and keeping them safe. Like religious ostriches, with their heads planted firmly up God’s ass, they remain blissfully unaware of their surroundings, with the unwavering belief that their mystical maker is going to co-pilot every aspect of their life for them - allowing them to absolve themselves of any personal responsibility and any action of caution that others outside of this delusion would take for granted as required.

Perhaps I should just be thankful that they’re blissfully ignorant. If they knew what was going on around them, I’m sure the reaction of shock would be more than those outside of the Mormon church would want to deal with.