Archive for the ‘Asides’ Category

Civil Disobedience and the American Community Survey

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

I got a visit from a federal agent last night.  Not law enforcement, but an official from the US Department of Commerce, specifically the Census Bureau. He was probably at the door to convince me that I needed to fill out the American Community Survey, which they sent to me twice, or to take down the answers himself.  I never gave him a chance to speak beyond identifying himself.

I told him what I had told the last Census Bureau employee who called my home, I consider the ACS to be a gross violation of my privacy rights, I will never fill it out and any further contact either by phone or in person would be considered harassment.  Apparently, the agent on the phone didn’t understand what I had said, for this other drone to be at my door.  Perhaps when I slammed the door in his face the message came across.

Now one might ask why it is that I object to the Census Bureau doing its job?  Because, frankly, it is not doing its job. Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution charges the House to make an enumeration of each state’s population, in order to determine the number of representatives that each state has in the House.  The wording is quite clear.

The actual Enumeration  shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

Simple and to the point.  Count the state populations, once every ten years after the first enumeration.  My answer to them and the only information required, is the occupancy total of adults living in the home.

The American Community Survey is not only in violation of the ten year enumeration clause, as they are spoon feeding it out to about three percent of the population every year, but it requests data which is simply none of the government’s business! From the start, the questions are very personal and only get worse as you leaf through the 28 page document.

The first question which really stands out is asking for your name.  Then your birth date.

The question immediately following asks if you have Hispanic, Latino or Spanish ancestry and if so, from where?  Mexico?  Puerto Rico?  Cuba?

What is your race? White?  Black, African Am., or Negro?  American Indian or Alaska Native?  Asian Indian? Chinese? Etc.

Once you get done filling in all this for each occupant of the home, the survey continues to probe into your housing affairs.

What kind of house do you live in?

How many acres of land does the house sit on?

In the past 12 months, what were the actual sales of all agricultural products from this property?

How many rooms does the home have?

How many of them are bathrooms?

Does this house, apartment, or mobile home have – Hot and cold running water?  A flush toilet?  A bathtub or shower?  A sink with a faucet?  A stove or range?  A refrigerator?  Telephone service?

How many automobiles, vans and trucks of one-ton capacity or less are kept at the home for use by members of this household?

Which fuel is used most for heating this home?

What is your monthly electric bill?

What is the yearly cost of water and sewer?

What is the yearly cost of oil, coal, kerosene, wood, etc. for this home?

Do you own your home?

What is your rent or mortgage payment amount?

As if this wasn’t intrusive enough and clearly none of the government’s damn business, the personal questions about each household member becomes a nightmare of intrusive query.

For up to five members of the household, you are asked what kind of health insurance coverage you have.

Is this person deaf?

Is this person blind?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?

Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?

Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?

What is your marital status?

In the past 12 months did this person get – Married? Widowed? Divorced?

How many times has this person been married?

In what year did this person last get married?

Has this person given birth to any children in the past 12 months?

Last week, did this person work for pay at a job or business?

At what location did this person work last week? (They ask for the full address!)

How did this person usually get to work last week?  Car, truck or van?  Bus or trolley bus?  Streetcar or trolley car?  Subway or elevated?  Railroad?  Ferryboat?  Taxicab?  Motorcycle?  Bicycle?  Walked?  Worked at home?  Other method?

What time did this person usually leave home to go to work last week?

It goes on, and on, asking about all sources of income, from Social Security to Veteran’s Compensation – requesting specific totals.  If for one moment you might suggest that the information is anonymous, think again!  They specifically ask for your full name at the beginning section and again for each individual personal survey section.

You can find an informational copy of this document at the Census Bureau, along with their claim, “Response to both is required by law.” See for yourself that I make no exaggerated claims on this document’s intrusive questioning.

The Census Bureau agent on the phone also claimed that I was required by law to fill out the ACS and send it in.  I can believe that I am required to enumerate the members of my household for the standard ten year census, though I haven’t looked up the code.  Perhaps they even have added the ACS to the required list.  But a law which violates my right to privacy, in violation of the Constitution itself, is not a law I am willing to obey.

It’s called civil disobedience, and in the case of the American Community Survey, I feel such a treatment is perfectly validated.

Removing Encryption from Home Directories in Ubuntu 9.10

Friday, March 5th, 2010

I recently assembled a new workstation for home and in the process did a clean install of Ubuntu 9.10 on the system.  Though I have been working with Ubuntu’s very handy ecryptfs setup for encrypted home directories, I had limited such to laptops and had never done so on a desktop system before.  I figured I would give it a try and see what happened.

Performance tests done by others had always shown that there was a slight degradation of speed on ecryptfs encrypted filesystems, which I had fully expected, but I ran into something I hadn’t dealt with on my laptop: directory trees with hundreds of thousands of files.

The difference in speed of accessing individual files a few at a time in ecryptfs was never really noticeable, but I had never tried to stat a tree of 600,000+ files before.  It was as if my brand new system was an artifact from the ’70’s.  It dropped to its knees and cried.

Not believing how slow it was, I tested the issue by copying the directory tree to an unencrypted filesystem on the same physical hard drive and the same task (running ‘tree’ on the directory structure) took only a few seconds, instead of minutes.  It was apparent that any task which had to do a lot of file stat processing, simply dragged to a crawl under ecyptfs.

I was left with the dilemma of how to deal with changing my entire home directory under the ecryptfs system – complete with Ubuntu’s handy automatic mounting – to a standard, unencrypted form.  A bit of searching on the Web lead to dozens of approaches, some as drastic as copying the files to an unencrypted filesystem and removing the ecryptfs software.  That seemed ludicrous to me.  There should be no reason to disable an entire feature globally, to deal with one directory.

I finally came across some handy information on a blog, which gave me a clue as to how the automatic mounting worked in Ubuntu 9.04.  Although not exactly the same as the Ubuntu 9.10 implementation, it was more than enough to give me a very simple way to not only remove the encryption from my home directory, but to allow the system to work for me in creating an encrypted directory to use within my home directory, which took advantage of the slick auto-mount setup the Ubuntu developers had designed.

So, should anyone stumble on this issue, I’ll detail the steps taken here on how to alter Ubuntu 9.10 to switch a full home directory encryption to a normal home directory with an auto-mounting encrypted sub-directory.  The process is amazingly simple.  All text in red are actual commands to type. Green text is a file or directory path. “username” is a token for the name of your account.

  • Logoff the system.  No occurrences of your user account should be active.
  • Login as root or a different sudo enabled account.
  • Make sure that your account’s home directory is not mounted, using the ‘df‘ command.  If it is still in place, use umount /home/username to un-mount the encrypted filesystem.
  • Change the line “/home/username” to “/home/username/Private” in the /home/.ecryptfs/username/.ecryptfs/Private.mnt file using your favorite text editor.
  • mkdir /home/username/Private
  • chown username.username Private
  • Reboot the computer. (You can try restarting the cryptdisks init scripts, but I didn’t have any luck with it.)

When you login now, your previous home directory will be mounted at /home/username/Private instead of at /home/username.  Login the first time using a console rather than X11 (Ctrl-Alt-[F1-F6] from the login screen should be available) and move what files you want from ~/Private to your home directory and use the ~/Private encrypted directory for your sensitive documents.  Moving your dotfiles and hidden sub-directories back into /home/username is a good idea, unless you feel like re-configuring Gnome or KDE.

From this point on, Ubuntu will continue to automatically mount and dismount your ~/Private directory, just as it did for your entire home directory before.

Brainless

Monday, December 21st, 2009

He’s being called “a living miracle” and “a true Christmas miracle” that has “changed so many lives”.

Nickolas Coke, born without a brain (a condition called Anencephaly,) has managed to survive for a year without heavy medical intervention.

His mother, Sheena Coke, claims that the child shows signs of emotion, “He’s smiling. He’s laughed for the first time. It was wonderful to hear him laugh.” Though she is being honest with herself, knowing that Nicholas’ continued survival is unlikely. The longest any baby born in Anencephalic condition has lived, was two and half years.

I can understand her futile hopefulness, as he is her child after all and the emotional toil must be horrific.  However, I find the situation itself to be extremely unsettling.

Let’s start with the basics: Nicholas was born without a brain, nothing more than a brain stem is in his skull.  He is completely unable to perceive anything, in any of the five senses and never will be able to.  He will never be able to feel anything emotionally. He will never be able to have a thought of any kind. The nerve tissue needed for all these things, does not exist in his skull. In blunt terms, Nicholas is a slab of meat, kept alive by the most basic, less-than-reptilian portion of the brain – a section that can do no more than control digestion, respiration and heart beat. He cannot even determine at the most rudimentary level if he is being fed, or expelling waste, or even breathing. Plants have an infinitely more sophisticated sensory experience than his!

How is this a miracle?

Nicholas is a freak occurrence of nature, which gave him enough nerve tissue at the end of a spinal cord to keep rudimentary autonomic functions working.  That he has survived this long is disturbing, not miraculous and that he is being coddled and propped up as a miracle of any kind, is far more disturbing yet.

It is understandable that his mother would anthropomorphize Nicholas’ random nerve firings as emotional reaction, but basic biology tells us that this is a pipe dream with absolutely no possibility of being real reactions of any kind from Nicholas.  He simply does not have the brain tissue necessary to be able to generate emotional responses to anything. A random firing of nerve signals is not an emotional response. Since he cannot perceive anything through any physical sense, he likewise cannot possibly react to anything in any fashion at all.

Though this writeup of the story at News First 5 is particularly rife with absurd emotionalism, the comments are cloying. Post after post of infantile, ludicrous claims of miraculous nature, centered around the “gifts from God” simply prove to me all the more, how utterly delusional religious people are! Furthermore, these comments prove another point I had suspected, but hadn’t seen such a complete display of: most religious minded people are utterly clueless about the very basic facts of biology and science in general. Their delusional mindset allows them to discount empirical evidence at a whim.

Nickolas Coke may be brainless, but at least it took an act of nature to do that to him.

Back in the Saddle Again

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

I was leaving the checkout when a young woman came up to me, presumably by identifying my riding gear, and asked, “Is the red motorcycle out there yours?”

My immediate thought was, this can’t be good.  “Yes.”

“I just backed into it.”

Definitely not good.

I followed her out into the parking lot and there was my GoldWing, laying on her starboard side, with the back corner of the port saddlebag smashed. The marks on the ground where the crash guards had dug into the pavement, told that the bike had been pushed about half a foot on the ground once it was over.

To say that I was pissed off is an understatement.  How can anyone miss an eight foot long, bright red motorcycle? I went to the starboard side, checked to make sure the kickstand was in the down position and picked the bike up by the handlebar and passenger hand hold.

After looking it over, I was estimating at least a $1000 repair bill, and the damage was slight. I asked the gal if she had called the police and she said she didn’t think they needed to be called. I informed her that if the damage was over $300, the police had to be on the scene. This might not have been the complete truth, as I don’t know the specifics of Utah law on this, but this is the general limit for most states.

She again insisted that the police did not need to be contacted and I informed her that she could call, or I would.  She called them and in the process called a male friend of hers, who arrived a few minutes before the police arrived.

The woman I was upset with, but I had not raised my voice. I didn’t lecture her and I saw no need to even talk to her until the police were on the scene.  What would be the point?

She had other plans, however, and proceeded to remark on how little damage there was and again didn’t see why the police had to be involved.

I replied by giving her a short story on how I had replaced the starboard saddlebag cover, which was $450 for the part alone, and was about to go into all of the damage I saw on the bike, when her male friend suddenly shouted at me, “You don’t talk to her! You have no reason to talk to her!”

I had kept my cool up to this point, but my mind was seething now. I wanted to tell this worthless little fucking asshole that no one here had named him god and that he had absolutely no authority over me, telling me who I could or could not talk to. I wanted to tell him how little I thought of his opinion and that I was only responding to her instigation of a conversation, and that if that he was so fucking worried about her talking to me, he should advise her to shut the hell up…

Instead, I said nothing. What would be the point?  His tiny little brain wouldn’t have understood the situation anyway.

No, I had only to wait for the police to arrive.

Her friend left after a few minutes, saying, “I hope it works out for you” as he walked past.

I replied back calmly, with a slight menace to the tone, “It will.”

A few minutes of silence later, a squad car pulled into the lot.  He parked next to me and the woman walked over. The officer asked me what had happened, and I told him the truth, “This lady came to tell me that she backed into my motorcycle, so I went outside and found the bike on it’s side.  I don’t know more than that, because I didn’t see it happen.”

The woman was instantly pissed and snarled, “Give me some credit.”

I was about to start into a lecture, but figured it wouldn’t be worth it.  How could I explain to someone who is already upset that I can’t give conjecture to the officer?  I could only tell him the facts and the facts were that I didn’t know what happened, other than she had admitted to running into my motorcycle.

The officer took her aside and asked her what had happened and though I couldn’t hear the conversation, I read her lips enough to know she admitted to hitting the bike and knocking it over.  She claimed that she didn’t see it, which seems obvious to me.  While she confessed to her transgression, I started to ponder what kind of living hell she would be in at this moment, if it had been a pedestrian she had backed over instead my motorcycle. Machines can be fixed, or even replaced if they are damaged beyond reasonable repair – but people can’t be put back together all that easily.  I wonder if she had thought about this at all?

Because it wasn’t just a motorcycle she hit.  It was a big red warning sign – an 850 pound wake-up call that she needed to slow down and use far more care when wealding the most dangerous weapon she owns: her car.

The officer went back to his vehicle, plugged the registration and insurance information for both of us into his report and printed off a copy for each of us.  This is what I wanted.  This is what I had been waiting for.  I now had a police officer’s testimony that she had admitted to hitting my motorcycle.  This is what was needed to keep the fight with her insurance company to a minimum.  Again, whether she understood this or not is unknown, but I would guess she hadn’t a clue. She seemed nice enough, having come in and informed me of the accident, rather than driving off – but on the other hand she could have been forced to do so, because the parking lot was very busy and there were most likely a half dozen witnesses at the time who would have pointed the finger at her.

Hit and run, even just property damage, is a very bad move.

So, whether it was her decent nature or self-preservation, I don’t know to this day.

When I got home I called my insurance company just to let them know what was going on.  I then called her company and filed a claim. The usual phone tag game was played and the bike went into the shop for appraisal.  The accident was on the fifth of November and I didn’t get the bike back until the 27th.

My estimate was damn close.  It was about $1200 to fix, though the shop missed damage on both brake lights on the port side, which I’m now having to send photos of, so that they can file this with her insurance as well.  My guess is I’ll have to eat it, because they screwed up the first time.  I won’t be pleased if this is so.

The shop was unable to find the exact replacement highway pegs, Mick-O-Pegs.  They’re still in business, so I don’t know how they missed it.  They replaced them with Küryakyn highway pegs, which I don’t find as functional, but honesty do find to be more comfortable and better looking. In the end, I’m not upset with the change.

One thing I do regret, which might have sped things up with her insurance as well, is that I didn’t demand a rental car.  I was out for three weeks without my primary transportation.  I won’t make that mistake again.

As for the woman who hit my bike, I have no harsh feelings.  I was pissed at the situation, not at her. I doubt she would have understood that at the time.

No, the only anger I have toward a person, is toward her little shit of a friend, who thinks that he has the authority to tell me what to do. I needed to keep things peaceful, so that the law would be on my side when it arrived, otherwise I would have stopped my conversation with her as requested and leveled it in a very close and uncomfortable fashion at him.

First Snow of the Year

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

Snow came early this year and cut me off from motorcycling today. The benches are covered right now in the Salt Lake valley.

I may be grounded from the bike today, but I can't complain about the scenery, even if the current cloud cover is making things a little dark.

The Nobel Prize is Null and Void

Friday, October 9th, 2009

If there was any doubt with Henry Kissinger’s Nobel Peace Prize award in 1973 (while he committed actions on Cambodia and Viet Nam that should warrant war crime charges)  that the Nobel Committee had lost their clout; that doubt was solidified to solid understanding with the current announcement awarding President Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, for Obama’s efforts to "rid the world of nuclear weapons".

Let’s review the process here, shall we? Obama had to be nominated to the Nobel Committee by the end of January of this year in order to be considered. By that time, Obama had done nothing along these lines, he wasn’t even President yet! Sorry, got that wrong. He had been President of the USA for two weeks.  As for his stint in congress, there isn’t a shade of nuclear weapons reduction in his actions.

To put it short, the President hasn’t done much more than wag his tongue at a few international speeches and all of that was after he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Let’s look at the President’s peace record outside of a handful of speeches geared toward nuclear disarmament: we are still at war in Afghanistan and Iraq.  Troops levels are being raised in Afghanistan, while there is no sign of leaving Iraq anytime in the near future.  By Obama’s decision, we’ve now entered militarily into Pakistan. There is still talk about invading Iran for "creating nuclear weapons" that no one can prove exists, or that Iran is even capable of creating.

Where is the peace in that?

The once lofty Nobel Peace Prize has been made into a mockery by the very committee designed to keep Nobel’s intentions valid and profound. Form has taken hold over function and a once important award has been reduced to a mockery of its former glory.