Archive for the ‘Asides’ Category

Congressman Rob Etheridge Assaults Student

Monday, June 14th, 2010

Showing his colors, Rep. Rob Etheridge (D-NC) physically assaulted a student on the street in Washington, D.C.  So far, charges have not been brought up against him, but the video plainly shows that he committed a criminal assault.

At the very minimum the House should apply some sort of disciplinary action for Rep. Etheridge’s violation of the House ethics rules.  Chances are instead, that he’ll get some kind of medal.

Addendum: I didn’t notice it at first, but take a close look at the time right after Rep. Etheridge grabs the young man’s wrist.  He attempts to spray him in the face with mace or pepper spray.  You can see the can in his hand as he finally moves away.

It’s Draw Muhammad Day

Thursday, May 20th, 2010

Stylized icon of Muhammed using crescent moons and starsRejoice in the western world’s glory, oh unenlightened ones.  As the west has embraced (led by the British Empire and the United States) the ideal of Freedom of Speech! This is an uncompromising view, that the human species should be able to say anything, to express themselves in any way, whether that offends someone or not.  It is the cornerstone of the very concept of liberty.

It is unfortunate that Molly Norris, a Seattle cartoonist, has felt the need to distance herself from her own viral creation, but when a good idea catches hold of the imagination, personal comfort often flies off with it.

In this case, it came in the form of a cartoon she drew, proclaiming May 20th as “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day”.  It took off like wildfire.

South Park's depiction of  Muhammad

And why wouldn’t it?  The very idea that the “religion of peace”, as Islam claims it is, would even threaten to kill people for creating images of their prophet, spits in the face of liberty!  As we in the west hold freedom of speech as dear to our hearts as the Muslim people hold their prophet – you’re asking for a fight.

Search engines will certainly lead you to many depictions of the Islamic prophet, but zombietime.com has the most extensive collection I could find.  Check them out.

Confidentially, You’re stupid

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

I received another email today with a bold footer exclaiming the email’s confidentiality. I have to laugh every time I see one of these utterly moronic banners.

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Think about what this notice is claiming. Putting aside for the moment that the recipient has not signed a confidentiality agreement, you don’t even get to this notice until you’ve already read the previous material! How in the world can one be held responsible for reading the material, when the notice not to is at the bottom of the message? Furthermore, if you contact the sender, you have also reviewed the material, as the sender’s identification is not in the disclosure statement. In responding to the sender, you have proved that you broke the supposed agreement.

Such are merely minor points, however.  That you never signed a confidentiality agreement of any kind is enough to utterly render this notification legally null and void. You cannot insist that someone has entered a contract agreement simply by receiving email from you.

Imagine having a footer which stated, “NOTICE: This email is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not one of the intended recipients and you read this email, you owe Boneheads, Inc. $20,000,000 in contract fees and must pay this amount immediately.”

Any such ludicrous attempt at establishing a contract with a non-signing recipient would be laughed out of court and end up as a footnote on Failblog.org.

To be fair, sometimes it is not the end user, but the email server of the corporation in question which appends these notices. If you work for a company which appears to have its fair share of litigious idiots, you might email yourself to see if this is the case. If so, contact your IT department and demand to know why it is that they want you to look like a blithering idiot with every email you send.

Because that is all these confidentiality notices really say.

Civil Disobedience and the American Community Survey

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

I got a visit from a federal agent last night.  Not law enforcement, but an official from the US Department of Commerce, specifically the Census Bureau. He was probably at the door to convince me that I needed to fill out the American Community Survey, which they sent to me twice, or to take down the answers himself.  I never gave him a chance to speak beyond identifying himself.

I told him what I had told the last Census Bureau employee who called my home, I consider the ACS to be a gross violation of my privacy rights, I will never fill it out and any further contact either by phone or in person would be considered harassment.  Apparently, the agent on the phone didn’t understand what I had said, for this other drone to be at my door.  Perhaps when I slammed the door in his face the message came across.

Now one might ask why it is that I object to the Census Bureau doing its job?  Because, frankly, it is not doing its job. Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution charges the House to make an enumeration of each state’s population, in order to determine the number of representatives that each state has in the House.  The wording is quite clear.

The actual Enumeration  shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

Simple and to the point.  Count the state populations, once every ten years after the first enumeration.  My answer to them and the only information required, is the occupancy total of adults living in the home.

The American Community Survey is not only in violation of the ten year enumeration clause, as they are spoon feeding it out to about three percent of the population every year, but it requests data which is simply none of the government’s business! From the start, the questions are very personal and only get worse as you leaf through the 28 page document.

The first question which really stands out is asking for your name.  Then your birth date.

The question immediately following asks if you have Hispanic, Latino or Spanish ancestry and if so, from where?  Mexico?  Puerto Rico?  Cuba?

What is your race? White?  Black, African Am., or Negro?  American Indian or Alaska Native?  Asian Indian? Chinese? Etc.

Once you get done filling in all this for each occupant of the home, the survey continues to probe into your housing affairs.

What kind of house do you live in?

How many acres of land does the house sit on?

In the past 12 months, what were the actual sales of all agricultural products from this property?

How many rooms does the home have?

How many of them are bathrooms?

Does this house, apartment, or mobile home have – Hot and cold running water?  A flush toilet?  A bathtub or shower?  A sink with a faucet?  A stove or range?  A refrigerator?  Telephone service?

How many automobiles, vans and trucks of one-ton capacity or less are kept at the home for use by members of this household?

Which fuel is used most for heating this home?

What is your monthly electric bill?

What is the yearly cost of water and sewer?

What is the yearly cost of oil, coal, kerosene, wood, etc. for this home?

Do you own your home?

What is your rent or mortgage payment amount?

As if this wasn’t intrusive enough and clearly none of the government’s damn business, the personal questions about each household member becomes a nightmare of intrusive query.

For up to five members of the household, you are asked what kind of health insurance coverage you have.

Is this person deaf?

Is this person blind?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?

Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?

Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?

What is your marital status?

In the past 12 months did this person get – Married? Widowed? Divorced?

How many times has this person been married?

In what year did this person last get married?

Has this person given birth to any children in the past 12 months?

Last week, did this person work for pay at a job or business?

At what location did this person work last week? (They ask for the full address!)

How did this person usually get to work last week?  Car, truck or van?  Bus or trolley bus?  Streetcar or trolley car?  Subway or elevated?  Railroad?  Ferryboat?  Taxicab?  Motorcycle?  Bicycle?  Walked?  Worked at home?  Other method?

What time did this person usually leave home to go to work last week?

It goes on, and on, asking about all sources of income, from Social Security to Veteran’s Compensation – requesting specific totals.  If for one moment you might suggest that the information is anonymous, think again!  They specifically ask for your full name at the beginning section and again for each individual personal survey section.

You can find an informational copy of this document at the Census Bureau, along with their claim, “Response to both is required by law.” See for yourself that I make no exaggerated claims on this document’s intrusive questioning.

The Census Bureau agent on the phone also claimed that I was required by law to fill out the ACS and send it in.  I can believe that I am required to enumerate the members of my household for the standard ten year census, though I haven’t looked up the code.  Perhaps they even have added the ACS to the required list.  But a law which violates my right to privacy, in violation of the Constitution itself, is not a law I am willing to obey.

It’s called civil disobedience, and in the case of the American Community Survey, I feel such a treatment is perfectly validated.

Following are links to other articles, videos and related material concerning the ACS:

Stop the American Community Survey Petition

The Census is Getting Personal

The Thought Police and the American Community Survey

Uncle Sam’s Way Too Nosy Survey

The US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey Interrogation

Civil Disobedience and the Census

The Census, the Constitution, and Civil Disobedience

Removing Encryption from Home Directories in Ubuntu 9.10 & 10.04

Friday, March 5th, 2010

I recently assembled a new workstation for home and in the process did a clean install of Ubuntu 9.10 on the system.  Though I have been working with Ubuntu’s very handy ecryptfs setup for encrypted home directories, I had limited such to laptops and had never done so on a desktop system before.  I figured I would give it a try and see what happened.

Performance tests done by others had always shown that there was a slight degradation of speed on ecryptfs encrypted filesystems, which I had fully expected, but I ran into something I hadn’t dealt with on my laptop: directory trees with hundreds of thousands of files.

The difference in speed of accessing individual files a few at a time in ecryptfs was never really noticeable, but I had never tried to stat a tree of 600,000+ files before.  It was as if my brand new system was an artifact from the ’70′s.  It dropped to its knees and cried.

Not believing how slow it was, I tested the issue by copying the directory tree to an unencrypted filesystem on the same physical hard drive and the same task (running ‘tree’ on the directory structure) took only a few seconds, instead of minutes.  It was apparent that any task which had to do a lot of file stat processing, simply dragged to a crawl under ecyptfs.

I was left with the dilemma of how to deal with changing my entire home directory under the ecryptfs system – complete with Ubuntu’s handy automatic mounting – to a standard, unencrypted form.  A bit of searching on the Web lead to dozens of approaches, some as drastic as copying the files to an unencrypted filesystem and removing the ecryptfs software.  That seemed ludicrous to me.  There should be no reason to disable an entire feature globally, to deal with one directory.

I finally came across some handy information on a blog, which gave me a clue as to how the automatic mounting worked in Ubuntu 9.04.  Although not exactly the same as the Ubuntu 9.10 implementation, it was more than enough to give me a very simple way to not only remove the encryption from my home directory, but to allow the system to work for me in creating an encrypted directory to use within my home directory, which took advantage of the slick auto-mount setup the Ubuntu developers had designed.

So, should anyone stumble on this issue, I’ll detail the steps taken here on how to alter Ubuntu 9.10 to switch a full home directory encryption to a normal home directory with an auto-mounting encrypted sub-directory.  The process is amazingly simple.  All text in red are actual commands to type. Green text is a file or directory path. “username” is a token for the name of your account.

  • Logoff the system.  No occurrences of your user account should be active.
  • Login as root or a different sudo enabled account.
  • Make sure that your account’s home directory is not mounted, using the ‘df‘ command.  If it is still in place, use umount /home/username to un-mount the encrypted filesystem.
  • Change the line “/home/username” to “/home/username/Private” in the /home/.ecryptfs/username/.ecryptfs/Private.mnt file using your favorite text editor.
  • mkdir /home/username/Private
  • chown username.username Private
  • Reboot the computer. (You can try restarting the cryptdisks init scripts, but I didn’t have any luck with it.)

When you login now, your previous home directory will be mounted at /home/username/Private instead of at /home/username.  Login the first time using a console rather than X11 (Ctrl-Alt-[F1-F6] from the login screen should be available) and move what files you want from ~/Private to your home directory and use the ~/Private encrypted directory for your sensitive documents.  Moving your dotfiles and hidden sub-directories back into /home/username is a good idea, unless you feel like re-configuring Gnome or KDE.

From this point on, Ubuntu will continue to automatically mount and dismount your ~/Private directory, just as it did for your entire home directory before.

Addendum: The procedure used above is identical in Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.

Brainless

Monday, December 21st, 2009

He’s being called “a living miracle” and “a true Christmas miracle” that has “changed so many lives”.

Nickolas Coke, born without a brain (a condition called Anencephaly,) has managed to survive for a year without heavy medical intervention.

His mother, Sheena Coke, claims that the child shows signs of emotion, “He’s smiling. He’s laughed for the first time. It was wonderful to hear him laugh.” Though she is being honest with herself, knowing that Nicholas’ continued survival is unlikely. The longest any baby born in Anencephalic condition has lived, was two and half years.

I can understand her futile hopefulness, as he is her child after all and the emotional toil must be horrific.  However, I find the situation itself to be extremely unsettling.

Let’s start with the basics: Nicholas was born without a brain, nothing more than a brain stem is in his skull.  He is completely unable to perceive anything, in any of the five senses and never will be able to.  He will never be able to feel anything emotionally. He will never be able to have a thought of any kind. The nerve tissue needed for all these things, does not exist in his skull. In blunt terms, Nicholas is a slab of meat, kept alive by the most basic, less-than-reptilian portion of the brain – a section that can do no more than control digestion, respiration and heart beat. He cannot even determine at the most rudimentary level if he is being fed, or expelling waste, or even breathing. Plants have an infinitely more sophisticated sensory experience than his!

How is this a miracle?

Nicholas is a freak occurrence of nature, which gave him enough nerve tissue at the end of a spinal cord to keep rudimentary autonomic functions working.  That he has survived this long is disturbing, not miraculous and that he is being coddled and propped up as a miracle of any kind, is far more disturbing yet.

It is understandable that his mother would anthropomorphize Nicholas’ random nerve firings as emotional reaction, but basic biology tells us that this is a pipe dream with absolutely no possibility of being real reactions of any kind from Nicholas.  He simply does not have the brain tissue necessary to be able to generate emotional responses to anything. A random firing of nerve signals is not an emotional response. Since he cannot perceive anything through any physical sense, he likewise cannot possibly react to anything in any fashion at all.

Though this writeup of the story at News First 5 is particularly rife with absurd emotionalism, the comments are cloying. Post after post of infantile, ludicrous claims of miraculous nature, centered around the “gifts from God” simply prove to me all the more, how utterly delusional religious people are! Furthermore, these comments prove another point I had suspected, but hadn’t seen such a complete display of: most religious minded people are utterly clueless about the very basic facts of biology and science in general. Their delusional mindset allows them to discount empirical evidence at a whim.

Nickolas Coke may be brainless, but at least it took an act of nature to do that to him.