Once more, clear and concise proof comes down the line, showing that our computer climate models are as bogus as the incomplete data they are fed.
The IPCC has been making shrill predictions for the changes to come, calling for drastic action on our part in order to help combat a century and a half of major CO2 emissions, all based on computer models showing that the world average temperature was on a one-way path of rising.
Only, the last decade there hasn’t been a rise, in spite of an increase in CO2 emissions. This last winter was such a cooling event, that it pretty much negated the last 100 years of warming. It’s hard to even come to a conclusion as to when the highest temperature was in the 20th century.
Now a new study is coming out saying that global warming is going to pause for another seven years, then get around to rising again.
This would mean that the 0.3°C global average temperature rise which has been predicted for the next decade by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change may not happen, according to the paper published in the scientific journal Nature.
However, the effect of rising fossil fuel emissions will mean that warming will accelerate again after 2015 when natural trends in the oceans veer back towards warming, according to the computer model.
Let’s boil down what is being said here. The previous model was wrong. Real data is showing that the previous predictions for the last decade were wrong. Now a new model says there will be a pause, then temperature will start climbing again.
So why are we supposed to believe that the new model is any more acurate than the others?
It’s also odd that “natural climate variations” can cause cooling, but can never be responsible for warming trends.
This all plays like every other doomsday prediction, from Nostradamus to the Bible – complete fiction.
Data from the Aqua satellite project show that the tropospheric “heat island” that is required for the feedback mechanism of anthropogenic global warming to occur, simply doesn’t exist. Without this mechanism, CO2 can only push warming so far, then it fails to have further affect.
Hopefully, real science, like the Aqua Project – which are examining actual data and not just playing with computer driven assumptions – will give us a better understand of what is going on and calm the retarded Green political seas of global warming.
