Archive for the ‘Political’ Category

Piglet Plague

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Let’s have another reality check over the now over-hyped swine flu pandemic.

So far, since the beginning of the year, swine flu has been responsible for over 816 deaths world wide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). 51 of these deaths have been in the USA.

As sad as this is, let’s compare this to a real world figure of a similar variety. Standard influenza, the everyday common flu, is responsible for approximately 36,000 deaths in the USA per year. If we multiply this by .58 to get a seven month value of 20,880 deaths to roughly match our current position in the calendar, regular influenza is 409 times more deadly than swine flu.

So why do we have government even discussing mass inoculations, pandemic emergencies and military intervention on US soil? Seriously, what’s the scare?

The scare is based on pure speculation. H1N1 swine flu virus is in the same family tree as the Spanish flu, of the great 1918 pandemic. That pandemic killed an estimated 50 to 100 million world wide, 500,000 to 675,000 in the US alone, at about a 2% mortality rate.

Again, as horrid as this is, that means there was a 98% survival rate and our medical science for dealing with hypercytokinemia, which was the leading cause of death stemming from the Spanish flu, is leaps and bounds above our previous methods of dealing with the problem: nothing at all! At least now we have ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, as well as T-cell inhibitors which can offer at least and avenue of attack against hypercytokinemia.

This scare also assumes that swine flu is going to mutate to have a worse effect than it currently does. This certainly isn’t a given fact. Even if it does, and it follows in the Spanish flu’s footsteps, the Spanish flu did it’s work in about nine months time and then simply disappeared as the human immune system naturally reacted and prevented the illness.

So why not play it safe anyway, ignore the fact that regular influenza is currently 409 times more deadly, and get inoculated against swine flu?

In 1976, when the first swine flu scare went through, 40 million were given vaccine shots to help prevent swine flu. Yet, the CDC and other medical organizations now state that there is was no effective vaccine against swine flu, and a new vaccine needed to be created. It was created earlier this year, but it’s yet untested.

From this timeline at WebMD:

“Pandemic swine flu vaccine is already rolling off the production lines of the five different vaccine makers supplying the U.S: 46% will come from Novartis, 26% will come from Sanofi Pasteur, 19% will come from CSL, 6% will come from MedImmune, and 3% will come from GlaxoSmithKline.

“By mid-July, clinical tests of the vaccines sponsored by the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases will begin at the eight Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati; Emory University, Atlanta; Group Health Cooperative, Seattle; Saint Louis University; University of Iowa, Iowa City; University of Maryland, Baltimore; and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

“The five vaccine manufacturers will also start separate clinical tests in the U.S., Australia, and Europe. These tests will begin in July and August.”

So, now the questions are piling up. What happened to the 1976 vaccine? If the 1976 vaccine didn’t work, why were 40 million Americans given the shot? If the 1976 vaccine didn’t really work, how do we know that this fast-tracked new vaccine will do any better? Why is the government pushing for everyone to be inoculated with this currently untested vaccine, to the point that they are considering military intervention on US soil?

For my own concern, I don’t see swine flu as a deadly problem. Regular influenza is far worse in fatality rate and far more wide spread. There are too many questions concerning these new vaccines and no where near enough time between the start of clinical tests and the beginning of deployment this autumn, to know whether the new vaccines are effective or even dangerous. The swine flu vaccine of 1976 had hundreds of people developing the extremely rare Guillain-Barre syndrome after vaccination. Thousands have filed suit over the years for this and other illness they claim came from the vaccine. Are similar dangers going to rear up for the new vaccine?

Even more worrisome in all this, is that the government has given legal immunity to any manufacturer of the swine flu vaccine.

This means that if there are unwanted effects, causing crippling illness or death, no one will be able to sue for any compensation. Instead, some special fund will be created by the government, with compensation being dispensed at the whim of a government agency.

That alone is enough for me to avoid the swine flu vaccine. When government steps in to protect an industry from retaliation for causing harm, something is seriously wrong.

Each person will have to decide for themselves, of course. For me, I don’t see the benefit and I see no real danger from this puny piglet plague.

Marching Toward Swine Flu

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

As if the march toward a police state in America isn’t happening quickly enough, now the scare of a pandemic, swine flu, has the military desiring to use troops on US soil in the event.

Considering how poorly the aftermath of hurricane Katrina was handled, I have a difficult time believing an actual outbreak will be dealt with any more efficiently or any more politely. People were forced out of their homes, even when they were not in danger. People had their weapons confiscated so that they couldn’t defend themselves. Troops patrolled the streets like it was a war zone.

None of this report mentions military physicians, just military personnel. That means that there are those in government planning for one or more of the following; forced vaccinations, forced quarantine, forced relocation, quelling civil disorder (possibly including weapon confiscation) and even full scale martial law.

Why do I use the word “forced” here? Because that’s all the military does, is use force. That’s what the military is designed to do. There is no respect for the Constitution, no respect for local laws, just military power and authority. While I’m absolutely certain that there are those in the military who take their oath seriously and would refuse unethical orders given, there are just as many who would follow any order, due to their indoctrination to the military programming of behavior. That can lead to a very dangerous situation and violation our liberties.

When the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act was signed into law in 2007, Posse Comitatus, the prohibition of using military force within the US for local law enforcement, was erroded. Sanity eventual returned in 2008, when this portion of the JWNDAA was repealed. If the military goes through with this plan, they will be doing so in direct violation of Posse Comitatus. There’s no need for it, either. The National Guard has long been exempt from Posse Comitatus, when called up by a state governor. If a situation arises where military personnel are needed, the Guard can handle it. It’s part of their designed duty and their training.

In any case, something bad is afoot if the government is even entertaining this idea. I also find it quite interesting how the press continues to hype up the case for a major pandemic in the fall, as if the government has had any success in predicting disease outbreaks of any kind. Why the certainty?

There are more questions than answers in the whole affair.

Bad Cops, No Donut

Friday, July 17th, 2009

An Unhealthy Lack of Choice

Monday, July 13th, 2009

Our country’s fall to socialism/communism is utterly staggering. Take in point the latest out of capital hill, where top Senate Democrats have now proposed an amendment to the latest health care bill, to fine anyone who does not buy health insurance, more than $1,000 per year.

This article from the Associated Press, briefly covers how the new health care bill will require health insurance purchases from US citizens in the same way that car insurance is required to operate a vehicle. Only, in the case of health care, we’re not talking about insurance over a privilege – a system one can easily opt out of all together, as no one is required to drive – but insurance over your own body! The only way to opt out of this system is to die.

For all of my disgust over the fall of the Republican party to the depraved, war-mongering, fascist scum they have become over the last couple decades, my disgust of the Democrats continues to grow on their longstanding and unwavering support of Constitutionally antithetical principals. Now that the Bush administration has proved to the world that the American people are willing to be sheep en masse, clamoring for the government to control every aspect of their lives in exchange for perceived protection, in lieu of actual courage under fire; the Democrats can finally push their lifelong agenda and burn the Constitution without even casual public impunity. They can do so, spending up through our great-great-grandchildren’s earnings, without the slightest whimper.

In the end, the beer slurping, television hypnotized American Idle, will give praise to how fine it is to finally have "universal health care", "just like the rest of the world" – never thinking of the real cost to their wallet or more importantly, their liberty.
 

Magical CO2

Monday, July 13th, 2009

It has long been predicted how the Church of Global Warming (CoGW) would be changing their shrill call from "global warming" to "climate change", as the Earth ignores their constantly failing computer models of rampant warming. The amazing, magical trace gas CO2 will now change climates around the world in every direction, to the point that every aberration from the norm will be blamed on man, instead of nature. After all, climates never changed on this planet before man was around.

This article from the BBC News marks another data point, which shows the CoGW (including the lap dog media) for the ignorant fraud they’re pushing. The article is over the recent rash of children dying from respiratory disease, due to the freezing temperatures that Peru is experiencing, three months earlier than normal.

This quote says it all…
 

"Experts blame climate change for the early arrival of intense cold which began in March."
 

What I find the most hilarious about this statement, is not just how crazy the claim is from a crowd hell bent on convincing us that we’re all going to boil away. It is the hypocrisy that makes me laugh. Anytime a single event is brought up by those who don’t buy this load of anthropogenic global warming bullshit, the CoGW screams from the rafters that you cannot take a single event, or even a single year’s trend, and claim that this is indicative of climate change of any kind. Yet, here they are, taking a single event and doing exactly that.

Just like a church, alright. I wonder how long it will be, before Gore is given the title of Saint?

By the way, BBC. Just who are the "experts" you’re referring to here? Not even a single attributed source and we’re supposed to just believe this statement?

 

Pure Evil

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

"The Obama administration is considering a change in the law for the military commissions at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, that would clear the way for detainees facing the death penalty to plead guilty without a full trial."

So states this article in The New York Times by William Glaberson.

I want you to read the sentence a few times over.  Mull it over in your mind what is being called for.  Grasp the very nature of this insanity and face the ugly, morality bereft purpose it portends.

This proposal is calling for the execution of held individuals, facing no actual charges, without holding a trial, if they confess to anything – even if the confession is taken under torture!

In current US military code, those who face capital charges cannot plead guilty, to prevent just this kind of abuse. Blend this insane proposal of accepting confessions under any circumstance with the compulsion of our government to torture confessions out of people and you have the perfect recipe for driving our culture straight back to the horrid injustice of the Inquisition!  The very call for such a thing is purely evil!

I could write a full respective post on this, but I would never surpass the simple strength of this post in Washington’s Blog.  I consider it mandatory reading.  Follow the links as well

In case all of this is still unclear, follow this scenario.  With the current insanity set by the Patriot Acts, the following can occur to anyone, foreign and US  citizens alike…

You are arrested under "suspicion of being a terrorist" (no actual charges filed) and are hauled off to some undisclosed military gulag.  Since you are considered an "enemy combatant", you will not be given any access to civilian court – you face a military tribunal, assuming they even hold one for you.  (They don’t have to, under the current law.)  You are denied access to a lawyer, tortured by waterboarding, sleep deprivation, psychological manipulation – under a whole litany of procedures that the CIA and military won’t even talk about, for whatever period of time the government wants to hold you.  Indefinitely if they want.  If your relatives even know what happened to you, they are not given access to you at any point.  During this period of indefinite incarceration, though no actual charges have ever been filed against you and no evidence exists that you were involved in any illicit activity, you confess guilt under torture to some "act of terrorism" which holds a captial penalty.  Without ever going to military trial and having never even talked to a lawyer (or anyone else outside of the military prison), the confession under torture is accepted and you are executed for it.

We are on the very brink, people!

If we fall into this hollow facade of "justice", we’ve lost absolutely everything good that this country ever stood for.

Addendum: I’ve reworded a major portion of this post to clarify the difference between military and civil court procedures and the affects of this proposal when blended with current law set by the Patriot Acts and others.