Archive for the ‘Science’ Category

Global Warming Scandals Growing

Thursday, February 18th, 2010

The Anthropogenic Global Warming Church (AGWC) has been hit pretty hard as of late.  In short, the old “consensus” is falling apart.

The first major hit is the so-called “Climategate”, where emails from various scientists pushing the global warming agenda were leaked to the public.  Hardest hit is Prof. Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia, who had to step down as directory of the Climatic Research Unit after the leaked emails showed that scientists were manipulating data to bolster their claims.  He now admits that the data supporting the famous “hockey stick” graph is missing, warming periods have happened before without human influence and even that there has been no warming since 1995.  Prof. Jones also refused Freedom of Information requests and now claims to have lost the data.

Shortly after this, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been caught up in a row, showing that many of their claims were based on false information from environment groups instead of published academic research.  Claims that the Himalayan glaciers are melting by AGW came from unfounded speculation from a popular magazine.  Another IPCC claim about the destruction of rain forests by AGW is now recognized by the London Times as, “an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise”, “authored by two green activists” from the World Wildlife Fund.  The IPCC reports of reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps and in Africa were taken from a dissertation by a Swiss student, who was quoting unsubstantiated rumors from mountain climbers.  IPCC claims of coral reef destruction by AGW came solely from advocacy articles from Greenpeace, with no peer-reviewed studies to support the claims.  The IPCC claim of Africa’s major agricultural loss came from a Canadian think tank, with no study to support it.  The IPCC claimed that the Netherlands was endangered, due to its 55 percent of land mass below sea level – when the truth is about 20 percent is below sea level. The IPCC has also been caught up by hard data showing that their claims of increased tropical storms is false.

In the US, scientists from Space Studies in Geophysics and Oceanography now state that Alaskan glacier loss was overestimated by 40 percent for a 40 year period. This data has been used for computer climate models.

Worse yet, Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts, both well established meteorologists, have discovered that starting in 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the U.S. National Climate Data Center purposely eliminated temperature measuring stations in rural, cooler locations – artificially pumping up the results.  This is not just a handful of stations either, the count went from 6,000 to less than 1,500.  The study also shows that jumps in global temperature from the NOAA coincide with cuts in weather stations used.  You can find a whole site devoted to surface stations problems.

Furthermore, the remaining stations used were compromised by local artificial conditions, such as being placed next to air conditioner exhausts, other heat exchangers and even trash burning barrels.

Russian scientists have discovered that readings from the coldest regions of the country had been omitted from the IPCC data.  Tree ring data, which indicated cooling since 1961, was truncated as well.

It’s not as if the common bloke couldn’t figure out something is wrong.  Europe and North America have been hit this winter with horrible cold and snowy weather.  So bad, the record cold weather is killing Florida’s coral reefs.

The American press, as usual, is so far out of step with reality that most of this news hasn’t been covered at all.

For those in the US who are trying to keep track of this all, I have found a handy, short guide.

As these scandals continue, I’m certain that the last remaining arguments from the AGWC will fall to the wayside and the environmental globalists will find a new boogyman to scare us all into the next scheme for global governance.  For if you examine the goals of the environmental movement, no matter what the crisis claimed, the solution is always the same: increased government control and taxation and destruction of capitalism.


Addendum: 2010/02/18

The spiral continues with a recent FOIA release of documents from NASA, showing blatant advocacy instead of scientific analysis.

Brainless

Monday, December 21st, 2009

He’s being called “a living miracle” and “a true Christmas miracle” that has “changed so many lives”.

Nickolas Coke, born without a brain (a condition called Anencephaly,) has managed to survive for a year without heavy medical intervention.

His mother, Sheena Coke, claims that the child shows signs of emotion, “He’s smiling. He’s laughed for the first time. It was wonderful to hear him laugh.” Though she is being honest with herself, knowing that Nicholas’ continued survival is unlikely. The longest any baby born in Anencephalic condition has lived, was two and half years.

I can understand her futile hopefulness, as he is her child after all and the emotional toil must be horrific.  However, I find the situation itself to be extremely unsettling.

Let’s start with the basics: Nicholas was born without a brain, nothing more than a brain stem is in his skull.  He is completely unable to perceive anything, in any of the five senses and never will be able to.  He will never be able to feel anything emotionally. He will never be able to have a thought of any kind. The nerve tissue needed for all these things, does not exist in his skull. In blunt terms, Nicholas is a slab of meat, kept alive by the most basic, less-than-reptilian portion of the brain – a section that can do no more than control digestion, respiration and heart beat. He cannot even determine at the most rudimentary level if he is being fed, or expelling waste, or even breathing. Plants have an infinitely more sophisticated sensory experience than his!

How is this a miracle?

Nicholas is a freak occurrence of nature, which gave him enough nerve tissue at the end of a spinal cord to keep rudimentary autonomic functions working.  That he has survived this long is disturbing, not miraculous and that he is being coddled and propped up as a miracle of any kind, is far more disturbing yet.

It is understandable that his mother would anthropomorphize Nicholas’ random nerve firings as emotional reaction, but basic biology tells us that this is a pipe dream with absolutely no possibility of being real reactions of any kind from Nicholas.  He simply does not have the brain tissue necessary to be able to generate emotional responses to anything. A random firing of nerve signals is not an emotional response. Since he cannot perceive anything through any physical sense, he likewise cannot possibly react to anything in any fashion at all.

Though this writeup of the story at News First 5 is particularly rife with absurd emotionalism, the comments are cloying. Post after post of infantile, ludicrous claims of miraculous nature, centered around the “gifts from God” simply prove to me all the more, how utterly delusional religious people are! Furthermore, these comments prove another point I had suspected, but hadn’t seen such a complete display of: most religious minded people are utterly clueless about the very basic facts of biology and science in general. Their delusional mindset allows them to discount empirical evidence at a whim.

Nickolas Coke may be brainless, but at least it took an act of nature to do that to him.

Putting Faith in its Place

Monday, October 5th, 2009

This is one of the most succinct explanations of the logic fallacies inherent to faith that I've ever run across.

Bravo to QualiaSoup (aka Doug) who put this together! Be sure to check out his other fantastic videos on the QualiaSoup YouTube Channel.

Piglet Plague

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Let’s have another reality check over the now over-hyped swine flu pandemic.

So far, since the beginning of the year, swine flu has been responsible for over 816 deaths world wide, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). 51 of these deaths have been in the USA.

As sad as this is, let’s compare this to a real world figure of a similar variety. Standard influenza, the everyday common flu, is responsible for approximately 36,000 deaths in the USA per year. If we multiply this by .58 to get a seven month value of 20,880 deaths to roughly match our current position in the calendar, regular influenza is 409 times more deadly than swine flu.

So why do we have government even discussing mass inoculations, pandemic emergencies and military intervention on US soil? Seriously, what’s the scare?

The scare is based on pure speculation. H1N1 swine flu virus is in the same family tree as the Spanish flu, of the great 1918 pandemic. That pandemic killed an estimated 50 to 100 million world wide, 500,000 to 675,000 in the US alone, at about a 2% mortality rate.

Again, as horrid as this is, that means there was a 98% survival rate and our medical science for dealing with hypercytokinemia, which was the leading cause of death stemming from the Spanish flu, is leaps and bounds above our previous methods of dealing with the problem: nothing at all! At least now we have ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, as well as T-cell inhibitors which can offer at least and avenue of attack against hypercytokinemia.

This scare also assumes that swine flu is going to mutate to have a worse effect than it currently does. This certainly isn’t a given fact. Even if it does, and it follows in the Spanish flu’s footsteps, the Spanish flu did it’s work in about nine months time and then simply disappeared as the human immune system naturally reacted and prevented the illness.

So why not play it safe anyway, ignore the fact that regular influenza is currently 409 times more deadly, and get inoculated against swine flu?

In 1976, when the first swine flu scare went through, 40 million were given vaccine shots to help prevent swine flu. Yet, the CDC and other medical organizations now state that there is was no effective vaccine against swine flu, and a new vaccine needed to be created. It was created earlier this year, but it’s yet untested.

From this timeline at WebMD:

“Pandemic swine flu vaccine is already rolling off the production lines of the five different vaccine makers supplying the U.S: 46% will come from Novartis, 26% will come from Sanofi Pasteur, 19% will come from CSL, 6% will come from MedImmune, and 3% will come from GlaxoSmithKline.

“By mid-July, clinical tests of the vaccines sponsored by the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases will begin at the eight Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati; Emory University, Atlanta; Group Health Cooperative, Seattle; Saint Louis University; University of Iowa, Iowa City; University of Maryland, Baltimore; and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.

“The five vaccine manufacturers will also start separate clinical tests in the U.S., Australia, and Europe. These tests will begin in July and August.”

So, now the questions are piling up. What happened to the 1976 vaccine? If the 1976 vaccine didn’t work, why were 40 million Americans given the shot? If the 1976 vaccine didn’t really work, how do we know that this fast-tracked new vaccine will do any better? Why is the government pushing for everyone to be inoculated with this currently untested vaccine, to the point that they are considering military intervention on US soil?

For my own concern, I don’t see swine flu as a deadly problem. Regular influenza is far worse in fatality rate and far more wide spread. There are too many questions concerning these new vaccines and no where near enough time between the start of clinical tests and the beginning of deployment this autumn, to know whether the new vaccines are effective or even dangerous. The swine flu vaccine of 1976 had hundreds of people developing the extremely rare Guillain-Barre syndrome after vaccination. Thousands have filed suit over the years for this and other illness they claim came from the vaccine. Are similar dangers going to rear up for the new vaccine?

Even more worrisome in all this, is that the government has given legal immunity to any manufacturer of the swine flu vaccine.

This means that if there are unwanted effects, causing crippling illness or death, no one will be able to sue for any compensation. Instead, some special fund will be created by the government, with compensation being dispensed at the whim of a government agency.

That alone is enough for me to avoid the swine flu vaccine. When government steps in to protect an industry from retaliation for causing harm, something is seriously wrong.

Each person will have to decide for themselves, of course. For me, I don’t see the benefit and I see no real danger from this puny piglet plague.

Magical CO2

Monday, July 13th, 2009

It has long been predicted how the Church of Global Warming (CoGW) would be changing their shrill call from "global warming" to "climate change", as the Earth ignores their constantly failing computer models of rampant warming. The amazing, magical trace gas CO2 will now change climates around the world in every direction, to the point that every aberration from the norm will be blamed on man, instead of nature. After all, climates never changed on this planet before man was around.

This article from the BBC News marks another data point, which shows the CoGW (including the lap dog media) for the ignorant fraud they’re pushing. The article is over the recent rash of children dying from respiratory disease, due to the freezing temperatures that Peru is experiencing, three months earlier than normal.

This quote says it all…
 

"Experts blame climate change for the early arrival of intense cold which began in March."
 

What I find the most hilarious about this statement, is not just how crazy the claim is from a crowd hell bent on convincing us that we’re all going to boil away. It is the hypocrisy that makes me laugh. Anytime a single event is brought up by those who don’t buy this load of anthropogenic global warming bullshit, the CoGW screams from the rafters that you cannot take a single event, or even a single year’s trend, and claim that this is indicative of climate change of any kind. Yet, here they are, taking a single event and doing exactly that.

Just like a church, alright. I wonder how long it will be, before Gore is given the title of Saint?

By the way, BBC. Just who are the "experts" you’re referring to here? Not even a single attributed source and we’re supposed to just believe this statement?

 

Carbon Tax for the Needy

Friday, January 9th, 2009

NewsBusters has a great little blurb on the Goddard Institute for Space Studies’ chief James Hansen’s letter to President Elect Obama, which outright calls for carbon taxes levied on anything related to carbon, for the sake of redistribution of wealth.  Here’s a prime quote from the letter.

The carbon tax has social benefits. It is progressive. It is useful to those most in need in hard times, providing them an opportunity for larger dividend than tax. It will encourage illegal immigrants to become legal, thus to obtain the dividend, and it will discourage illegal immigration because everybody pays the tax, but only legal citizens collect the dividend.

The full text of the letter can be found here, in PDF format.

Well, at least the Church of Global Warming is finally showing their true stripes.