Posts Tagged ‘rights’

Civil Disobedience and the American Community Survey

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

I got a visit from a federal agent last night.  Not law enforcement, but an official from the US Department of Commerce, specifically the Census Bureau. He was probably at the door to convince me that I needed to fill out the American Community Survey, which they sent to me twice, or to take down the answers himself.  I never gave him a chance to speak beyond identifying himself.

I told him what I had told the last Census Bureau employee who called my home, I consider the ACS to be a gross violation of my privacy rights, I will never fill it out and any further contact either by phone or in person would be considered harassment.  Apparently, the agent on the phone didn’t understand what I had said, for this other drone to be at my door.  Perhaps when I slammed the door in his face the message came across.

Now one might ask why it is that I object to the Census Bureau doing its job?  Because, frankly, it is not doing its job. Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution charges the House to make an enumeration of each state’s population, in order to determine the number of representatives that each state has in the House.  The wording is quite clear.

The actual Enumeration  shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

Simple and to the point.  Count the state populations, once every ten years after the first enumeration.  My answer to them and the only information required, is the occupancy total of adults living in the home.

The American Community Survey is not only in violation of the ten year enumeration clause, as they are spoon feeding it out to about three percent of the population every year, but it requests data which is simply none of the government’s business! From the start, the questions are very personal and only get worse as you leaf through the 28 page document.

The first question which really stands out is asking for your name.  Then your birth date.

The question immediately following asks if you have Hispanic, Latino or Spanish ancestry and if so, from where?  Mexico?  Puerto Rico?  Cuba?

What is your race? White?  Black, African Am., or Negro?  American Indian or Alaska Native?  Asian Indian? Chinese? Etc.

Once you get done filling in all this for each occupant of the home, the survey continues to probe into your housing affairs.

What kind of house do you live in?

How many acres of land does the house sit on?

In the past 12 months, what were the actual sales of all agricultural products from this property?

How many rooms does the home have?

How many of them are bathrooms?

Does this house, apartment, or mobile home have – Hot and cold running water?  A flush toilet?  A bathtub or shower?  A sink with a faucet?  A stove or range?  A refrigerator?  Telephone service?

How many automobiles, vans and trucks of one-ton capacity or less are kept at the home for use by members of this household?

Which fuel is used most for heating this home?

What is your monthly electric bill?

What is the yearly cost of water and sewer?

What is the yearly cost of oil, coal, kerosene, wood, etc. for this home?

Do you own your home?

What is your rent or mortgage payment amount?

As if this wasn’t intrusive enough and clearly none of the government’s damn business, the personal questions about each household member becomes a nightmare of intrusive query.

For up to five members of the household, you are asked what kind of health insurance coverage you have.

Is this person deaf?

Is this person blind?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?

Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?

Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing?

Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?

What is your marital status?

In the past 12 months did this person get – Married? Widowed? Divorced?

How many times has this person been married?

In what year did this person last get married?

Has this person given birth to any children in the past 12 months?

Last week, did this person work for pay at a job or business?

At what location did this person work last week? (They ask for the full address!)

How did this person usually get to work last week?  Car, truck or van?  Bus or trolley bus?  Streetcar or trolley car?  Subway or elevated?  Railroad?  Ferryboat?  Taxicab?  Motorcycle?  Bicycle?  Walked?  Worked at home?  Other method?

What time did this person usually leave home to go to work last week?

It goes on, and on, asking about all sources of income, from Social Security to Veteran’s Compensation – requesting specific totals.  If for one moment you might suggest that the information is anonymous, think again!  They specifically ask for your full name at the beginning section and again for each individual personal survey section.

You can find an informational copy of this document at the Census Bureau, along with their claim, “Response to both is required by law.” See for yourself that I make no exaggerated claims on this document’s intrusive questioning.

The Census Bureau agent on the phone also claimed that I was required by law to fill out the ACS and send it in.  I can believe that I am required to enumerate the members of my household for the standard ten year census, though I haven’t looked up the code.  Perhaps they even have added the ACS to the required list.  But a law which violates my right to privacy, in violation of the Constitution itself, is not a law I am willing to obey.

It’s called civil disobedience, and in the case of the American Community Survey, I feel such a treatment is perfectly validated.

Pure Evil

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

"The Obama administration is considering a change in the law for the military commissions at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, that would clear the way for detainees facing the death penalty to plead guilty without a full trial."

So states this article in The New York Times by William Glaberson.

I want you to read the sentence a few times over.  Mull it over in your mind what is being called for.  Grasp the very nature of this insanity and face the ugly, morality bereft purpose it portends.

This proposal is calling for the execution of held individuals, facing no actual charges, without holding a trial, if they confess to anything – even if the confession is taken under torture!

In current US military code, those who face capital charges cannot plead guilty, to prevent just this kind of abuse. Blend this insane proposal of accepting confessions under any circumstance with the compulsion of our government to torture confessions out of people and you have the perfect recipe for driving our culture straight back to the horrid injustice of the Inquisition!  The very call for such a thing is purely evil!

I could write a full respective post on this, but I would never surpass the simple strength of this post in Washington’s Blog.  I consider it mandatory reading.  Follow the links as well

In case all of this is still unclear, follow this scenario.  With the current insanity set by the Patriot Acts, the following can occur to anyone, foreign and US  citizens alike…

You are arrested under "suspicion of being a terrorist" (no actual charges filed) and are hauled off to some undisclosed military gulag.  Since you are considered an "enemy combatant", you will not be given any access to civilian court – you face a military tribunal, assuming they even hold one for you.  (They don’t have to, under the current law.)  You are denied access to a lawyer, tortured by waterboarding, sleep deprivation, psychological manipulation – under a whole litany of procedures that the CIA and military won’t even talk about, for whatever period of time the government wants to hold you.  Indefinitely if they want.  If your relatives even know what happened to you, they are not given access to you at any point.  During this period of indefinite incarceration, though no actual charges have ever been filed against you and no evidence exists that you were involved in any illicit activity, you confess guilt under torture to some "act of terrorism" which holds a captial penalty.  Without ever going to military trial and having never even talked to a lawyer (or anyone else outside of the military prison), the confession under torture is accepted and you are executed for it.

We are on the very brink, people!

If we fall into this hollow facade of "justice", we’ve lost absolutely everything good that this country ever stood for.

Addendum: I’ve reworded a major portion of this post to clarify the difference between military and civil court procedures and the affects of this proposal when blended with current law set by the Patriot Acts and others.

Free Speech is Sacred

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Pat Condell has had more than his share of inspiring speeches, but this one is his best so far.  This biting commentary is well worth the time.

Obama Wants to Continue to Spy On You

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

More lack of change, and this one is ugly.  The Obama Administration has been putting pressure on the court to set aside a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, who are attempting to sue the government over illegal wire tapping.  Rather than rehash the whole thing, just read these two articles at Wired.  One and Two.

Big Obama is Watching You…

Closing Gitmo is a Farce

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

It doesn’t matter that the Guantanamo Bay facility is to be closed in the next year’s time, or that the Executive Order President Obama signed establishes that no prisoner can be treated outside of the what the Army Field Manual states – because the manual currently includes extraordinary rendition, solitary confinement and other methods of isolation, sleep and sensory deprivation, and manipulation and creation of fears through what would be call psychological duress.  Translation: the prisoners at Gitmo are simply being moved to other facilities and can still be held without charge indefinitely, simply by order of the President stating that the individual is an enemy combatant and can still be held to what some might consider, torturous conditions.

What this amounts to is a shell game, designed to show the American Idle, Obamabots and world leaders that Obama is “living up” to campaign promises, while proving to those who actually read these things that nothing really has changed and the mess is being swept under the rug.  No prisoners in Gitmo!  Now they’re in facilities in Egypt, other areas of the US, or held on Naval ships at sea etc.

More on the underlying crap involved in this shell game can be found here, here and here.

Another Portion of the Patriot Act Found to be Unconstitutional

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

Not much I can add to this one, other than, “It’s about damn time!”  A federal appeals court found the provision in the Patriot Act which prevented recipients of National Security Letters from speaking out about the request, is a violation of the First Amendment.

“We are gratified that the appeals court found that the FBI cannot silence people with complete disregard for the First Amendment simply by saying the words ‘national security,’” said Melissa Goodman, staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project.

See the ACLU press release for more information.